Sparr v. Sutherland

Appellate Court of Illinois

Sparr v. Sutherland

64 Ill. App. 160, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 864

DecidedApril 27, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 64 Ill. App. 160 (Sparr v. Sutherland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sparr v. Sutherland, 64 Ill. App. 160, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 864 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action of assumpsit brought to recover the price of a carload of lumber sold to appellants.

The defense was a claim for damages for failure to ship fourteen car loads of lumber alleged to have been contracted ■ for by appellants.

The court found that no such contract was proven, and in. this conclusion we agree.

We do not find from an examination of the abstract that any prejudical error was committed by the court in admitting in evidence papers offered by appellee, or that any error warranting a reversal of the judgment is shown. The merits are clearly with appellee. ... - . .

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI