Sparks v. Y. & T. Co.

118 N.E.2d 691, 67 Ohio Law. Abs. 47
CourtCourt of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
DecidedJanuary 29, 1952
DocketNo. 4591
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 118 N.E.2d 691 (Sparks v. Y. & T. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sparks v. Y. & T. Co., 118 N.E.2d 691, 67 Ohio Law. Abs. 47 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1952).

Opinion

[48]*48OPINION

By MILLER, J.

This is a law appeal from the judgment of the Municipal Court of Columbus, Ohio. The action was one to recover rent paid on real estate in excess of the maximum fixed by the Office of Price Administration. The petition sets forth a cause of action seeking triple damages in the sum of $930.00 and $50.00 attorney fees.

The answer was a general denial. A cross-petition was also filed in which the defendant sought $500.00 for the conversion of certain furniture.

Upon the issues drawn trial was had, the Court entering up judgment for the plaintiff for the sum of $360.00 plus $100.00 attorney fees.

The error assigned is that the judgment is contrary to law in that the plaintiff was allowed a greater sum for attorney fees than he had sought in the petition, to wit, $100.00, whereas the petition sought only $50.00.

Although not separately stated and numbered, the petition in reality sets forth two causes of action: one for the recovery of the excessive rent payments in the form of triple damages, and the other for attorney fees for the collection of the same. Sec. 11305 GC defines what the petition must contain and provides that if the recovery of money is demanded the amount shall be stated. As the plaintiff only sought $50.00 in the cause of action seeking attorney fees, his recovery must be limited to that amount. The record reveals that the summons contained the endorsement that the amount sought was $980.00. Therefore the Court had jurisdiction to enter the judgment which we find to be erroneous in amount only. The judgment will be modified and since the recovery for rent is not in dispute we will enter the judgment that should have been entered, to wit, judgment for the plaintiff for $360.00 and $50.00 attorney fees.

HORNBECK, PJ, WISEMAN, J, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brookridge Party Center, Inc. v. Fisher Foods, Inc.
468 N.E.2d 63 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 N.E.2d 691, 67 Ohio Law. Abs. 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sparks-v-y-t-co-ohctcomplfrankl-1952.