Sparks v. Sterling Doubleday Enterprises, LP

300 A.D.2d 467, 752 N.Y.S.2d 79
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 16, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 300 A.D.2d 467 (Sparks v. Sterling Doubleday Enterprises, LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sparks v. Sterling Doubleday Enterprises, LP, 300 A.D.2d 467, 752 N.Y.S.2d 79 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), entered October 4, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The infant plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries when, while in the Shea Stadium stands, he was struck by a baseball hit during batting practice. Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, by furnishing sufficient protective screening behind home plate where the danger of being struck by a baseball is the greatest, the defendant fulfilled its duty of care and cannot be held liable in negligence (see Akins v Glens Falls City School Dist., 53 NY2d 325; Lynch v Board of Educ. for Oceanside School Dist., 225 AD2d 741). The defendant is not required to be an insurer of the safety of spectators who choose to occupy unprotected areas (see Davidoff v Metropolitan Baseball Club, 61 NY2d 996, 998). Moreover, that the infant plaintiff was a member of a school marching band invited to participate in opening day ceremonies is of no moment (see Stern v Madison Sq. Garden [468]*468Corp., 226 AD2d 444). The infant plaintiff was still a spectator who assumed the risk of his injuries (see Honohan v Turrone, 297 AD2d 705).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tarantino v. Queens Ballpark Co., LLC
123 A.D.3d 1105 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
John Coomer v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corporation
437 S.W.3d 184 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2014)
Cohen v. Sterling Mets, L.P.
17 Misc. 3d 218 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)
Pira v. Sterling Equities, Inc.
16 A.D.3d 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Ray v. Hudson Valley Stadium Corp.
306 A.D.2d 264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
300 A.D.2d 467, 752 N.Y.S.2d 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sparks-v-sterling-doubleday-enterprises-lp-nyappdiv-2002.