Sparks v. State
This text of 261 S.W.2d 571 (Sparks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The offense is the possession of marijuana; the punishment, two years.
In view of our disposition of this case, a statement of the facts is not deemed necessary.
By one bill it is shown that the county attorney, among other things, said: “. . . and I am most thankful that the person charged with its possession is not a resident, and is not a citizen of Harrison County. ...”
*112 By another bill it is shown that the county attorney, among other things, said: . he didn’t want the bugs to get it, but wanted to sell it to the school children of Gregg County. . . .”
We have diligently searched the record before us and fail to find any evidence from which the prosecutor might logically deduce the foregoing statement of fact to the jury.
The trial court should have sustained appellant’s objection to this argument and instructed the jury not to consider it. A prosecutor will not be permitted to inject new facts into the case during the course of his argument and then play upon the prejudices of the jury through the use of these facts which are not a part of the record.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 S.W.2d 571, 159 Tex. Crim. 111, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sparks-v-state-texcrimapp-1953.