Sparks v. State

183 S.W. 144, 79 Tex. Crim. 83, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 67
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sparks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 Tex. Crim. 263
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 2, 1916·No. No. 3934.·Published

Opinions

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and his punishment assessed at thirty days confinement in the county jail.

The Assistant Attorney General moves to dismiss the appeal, there being no recognizance in the record, and it not affirmatively appearing by the record that appellant is in jail. The record must disclose that a recognizance has been given, or that the appellant is in jail and has been continuously confined therein, to confer jurisdiction on this court. McHenry v. State, 42 Texas Crim. Rep., 469; Harris v. State, 2 Texas Crim. App., 134; Brinson v. State, 68 Texas Crim. Rep., 49, 150 S. W. Rep., 776, and cases collated under art. 918 of "Vernon’s Crim. Proc.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

DAVIDS OH, Judge, not present at consultation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sparks v. State, 183 S.W. 144, 79 Tex. Crim. 83, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 67 (Tex. 1916).

183 S.W. 144 (Sparks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brinson v. State
150 S.W. 776 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
McHenry v. State
60 S.W. 880 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1901)