Sparks v. State

673 So. 2d 192, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5133, 1996 WL 252989
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 1996
DocketNo. 95-2234
StatusPublished

This text of 673 So. 2d 192 (Sparks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sparks v. State, 673 So. 2d 192, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5133, 1996 WL 252989 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, as to appellant’s sentence on Count III, we remand to the trial court for correction of the written sentence to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Tannihill v. State, 559 So.2d 608, 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tannihill v. State
559 So. 2d 608 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 So. 2d 192, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5133, 1996 WL 252989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sparks-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.