Sparks v. State
673 So. 2d 192, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5133, 1996 WL 252989
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sparks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 740 So. 2d 33 →
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, as to appellant’s sentence on Count III, we remand to the trial court for correction of the written sentence to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Tannihill v. State, 559 So.2d 608, 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sparks v. State, 673 So. 2d 192, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5133, 1996 WL 252989 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
673 So. 2d 192 (Sparks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tannihill v. State
559 So. 2d 608 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)