Sparks v. Noyes
64 Ga. 437
Opinion
The first grant of a new trial will not be reversed by this court unless the plaintiff in error makes it appear from the record that the judge-abused his discretion in granting it, and that the law and facts require the verdict, notwithstanding the judgment of the presiding judge. The principle ruled in the case of Merriam vs. The City of Atlanta, 61 Ga., 222, covers this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sparks v. Noyes, 64 Ga. 437 (Ga. 1879).
64 Ga. 437 (Sparks v. Noyes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Head v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
490 S.E.2d 497 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
McCormick v. Denny
93 S.E.2d 578 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Wellbeloved v. Wellbeloved
75 S.E.2d 424 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Hopkins v. Brumbelow
24 S.E.2d 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Moody v. Moody
22 S.E.2d 836 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Cox v. Grady
64 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)