Sparks v. Conrad
Opinion
1. The right of a plaintiff in ejectment to recover upon prior possession alone, or upon a prescriptive title based on seven years adverse possession under color of title, cannot be defeated by showing a subsequent possession in the defendant which he obtained by procuring the plaintiff’s tenant to attorn to him, the latter having never surrendered possession to his landlord, the plaintiff. Possession thhs acquired by the defendant cannot be treated as an adverse holding against the [644]*644plaintiff, nor made the basis of a prescriptive title in the defendant. Nor, under such circumstances, can the defendant, he being a mere wrong-doer, defeat the plaintiff’s action by showing outstanding title in another.
2. This case, upon its facts, is controlled by the law above announced, and irrespective of the various questions presented by the record, the verdict for the plaintiff was manifestly right.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
27 S.E. 764 (Sparks v. Conrad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.