Sparks v. Conrad
This text of 27 S.E. 764 (Sparks v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The right of a plaintiff in ejectment to recover upon prior possession alone, or upon a prescriptive title based on seven years adverse possession under color of title, cannot be defeated by showing a subsequent possession in the defendant which he obtained by procuring the plaintiff’s tenant to attorn to him, the latter having never surrendered possession to his landlord, the plaintiff. Possession thhs acquired by the defendant cannot be treated as an adverse holding against the [644]*644plaintiff, nor made the basis of a prescriptive title in the defendant. Nor, under such circumstances, can the defendant, he being a mere wrong-doer, defeat the plaintiff’s action by showing outstanding title in another.
2. This case, upon its facts, is controlled by the law above announced, and irrespective of the various questions presented by the record, the verdict for the plaintiff was manifestly right.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 S.E. 764, 99 Ga. 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sparks-v-conrad-ga-1896.