Sparks v. Bedford
This text of 60 S.E. 809 (Sparks v. Bedford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. To publicly call a young white woman “a Decatur street whore” is actionable. Malice and damage will be inferred. Civil Code, § 3837; Pledger v. Hathcock, 1 Ga. 550.
2. It was not error to charge the jury that a witness could be impeached by proof of general bad “moral” character. The use of the word “moral” was neither restrictive nor misleading. General bad character, as a ground of impeachment, refers to general bad. moral character, the word “moral” being used in its broadest sense.
3. Newly discovered evidence which is merely cumulative and impeaching is not ground for new trial.
4. No material error of law appears, and the verdict was fully warranted by the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 S.E. 809, 4 Ga. App. 13, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sparks-v-bedford-gactapp-1908.