Sparkman v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Sparkman v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.

1926 OK 364, 245 P. 825, 117 Okla. 235, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 783

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 13, 1926

Docket14284

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 1926 OK 364 (Sparkman v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sparkman v. W. T. Rawleigh Co., 1926 OK 364, 245 P. 825, 117 Okla. 235, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 783 (Okla. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

The plaintiff below, opposing attorneys, and the issues are the same, and the evidence tendered by the defendants is in effect the same, as in the case of I. J. Gordon et al. v. W. T. Raw-leigh Co., No. 14285, this day decided, infra, p. 235. The opinion and syllabus in thp.t case are adopted as the opinion and syllabus in this case, and the judgment 'is affirmed.

Defendant in error in this case hrs asked for a judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas bond filed herein, in the event the judgment of the trial court should ■ be affirmed, it appearing that judgment herein was superseded by a bond on which R. D. Pratt and J. H. Pruitt were sureties. Judgment is therefore rendered against the said sureties on the supersedeas bond.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI