Sparkman v. State

862 So. 2d 866, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18797, 2003 WL 22927138
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 12, 2003
DocketNo. 5D03-3660
StatusPublished

This text of 862 So. 2d 866 (Sparkman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sparkman v. State, 862 So. 2d 866, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18797, 2003 WL 22927138 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Glenn, 558 So.2d 4 (Fla.1990) (holding modification in law of double jeopardy does not apply retroactively); State v. Jensen, 557 So.2d 23 (Fla.1990) (stating decision finding convictions for trafficking and possession of same cocaine violate double jeopardy doesn’t apply retroactively).

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Glenn
558 So. 2d 4 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
State v. Jensen
557 So. 2d 23 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
862 So. 2d 866, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18797, 2003 WL 22927138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sparkman-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.