Sparkill Realty Corp. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sparkill Realty Corp. v. State

252 A.D. 911

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1937

DocketClaim No. 19587

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 911 (Sparkill Realty Corp. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sparkill Realty Corp. v. State, 252 A.D. 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by respondents to dismiss appellant’s appeal. Appellant is in default for failure to serve its record on appeal, with the notice of appeal or in the alternative to obtain an extension of time from the Court of Claims, or a judge thereof. (Court of Claims Act, § 31.) Motion granted, unless the appellant serves printed case on appeal by January 10, 1938, its brief by February 1, 1938, and is ready for argument at the March, 1938, term, in which event it is denied. Appellant’s cross-motion for an order dispensing with the printing of certain portions of the record is not passed upon. (Id. § 31.) Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser' Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondents to dismiss appellant’s appeal. Appellant is in default for failure to serve its record on appeal, with the notice of appeal or in the alternative to obtain an extension of time from the Court of Claims, or a judge thereof. (Court of Claims Act, § 31.) Motion granted, unless the appellant serves printed case on appeal by January 10, 1938, its brief by February 1, 1938, and is ready for argument at the March, 1938, term, in which event it is denied. Appellant’s cross-motion for an order dispensing with the printing of certain portions of the record is not passed upon. (Id. § 31.) Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser' Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sparkill-realty-corp-v-state-nyappdiv-1937.