Sparkes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sparkes v. State

682 So. 2d 1232, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12331, 1996 WL 670559

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 20, 1996

DocketNo. 96-0443

StatusPublished

This text of 682 So. 2d 1232 (Sparkes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sparkes v. State, 682 So. 2d 1232, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12331, 1996 WL 670559 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s orders of restitution that require appellant to pay the victim’s family for out-of-pocket expenses and [1233]*1233reimbursement to the Florida Crimes Compensation Fund. See § 960.17, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994). We reverse the order requiring appellant to pay investigative costs to the Forensic Automobile Investigation as an item of restitution and remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to enter an order properly assessing that payment as a cost of investigation. Staudt v. State, 616 So.2d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Brown v. State, 591 So.2d 1069 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s orders of restitution that require appellant to pay the victim’s family for out-of-pocket expenses and [1233]*1233reimbursement to the Florida Crimes Compensation Fund. See § 960.17, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994). We reverse the order requiring appellant to pay investigative costs to the Forensic Automobile Investigation as an item of restitution and remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to enter an order properly assessing that payment as a cost of investigation. Staudt v. State, 616 So.2d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Brown v. State, 591 So.2d 1069 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

682 So. 2d 1232, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12331, 1996 WL 670559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sparkes-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack