Sparkes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sparkes v. State

682 So. 2d 1232, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12331, 1996 WL 670559

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 1996·No. No. 96-0443·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s orders of restitution that require appellant to pay the victim’s family for out-of-pocket expenses and [1233]*1233reimbursement to the Florida Crimes Compensation Fund. See § 960.17, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994). We reverse the order requiring appellant to pay investigative costs to the Forensic Automobile Investigation as an item of restitution and remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to enter an order properly assessing that payment as a cost of investigation. Staudt v. State, 616 So.2d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Brown v. State, 591 So.2d 1069 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s orders of restitution that require appellant to pay the victim’s family for out-of-pocket expenses and [1233]*1233reimbursement to the Florida Crimes Compensation Fund. See § 960.17, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994). We reverse the order requiring appellant to pay investigative costs to the Forensic Automobile Investigation as an item of restitution and remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to enter an order properly assessing that payment as a cost of investigation. Staudt v. State, 616 So.2d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Brown v. State, 591 So.2d 1069 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Sparkes v. State, 682 So. 2d 1232, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12331, 1996 WL 670559 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

682 So. 2d 1232 (Sparkes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related