Sparacino v. Minnet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sparacino v. Minnet

261 A.D.2d 467, 688 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4767

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D.2d 467 (Sparacino v. Minnet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sparacino v. Minnet, 261 A.D.2d 467, 688 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence and wrongful death, nonparty Peter J. Kurshan appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated April 6, 1998, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to impose a sanction upon him, and sanctioned him $5,000. The defendant Freightliner, Inc., also appeals from the order.

Ordered that the appeal of Freightliner, Inc., is dismissed, for failure to perfect the appeal (see, 22 NYCRR 670.8 [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from by Peter J. Kurshan, on the law, without costs or disburse[468]*468ments, that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to impose a sanction upon the appellant is denied, and the sanction imposed is vacated.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, a sanction was not warranted. S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence and wrongful death, nonparty Peter J. Kurshan appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated April 6, 1998, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to impose a sanction upon him, and sanctioned him $5,000. The defendant Freightliner, Inc., also appeals from the order.

Ordered that the appeal of Freightliner, Inc., is dismissed, for failure to perfect the appeal (see, 22 NYCRR 670.8 [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from by Peter J. Kurshan, on the law, without costs or disburse[468]*468ments, that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to impose a sanction upon the appellant is denied, and the sanction imposed is vacated.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, a sanction was not warranted. S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D.2d 467, 688 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sparacino-v-minnet-nyappdiv-1999.