Spano v. Perini Corp.
This text of 33 A.D.2d 516 (Spano v. Perini Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On remittitur (Spcmo v. Perini Corp., 25 N Y 2d 11), order of the Appellate Term, entered on January 25, 1968, reversing judgments of the Civil Court entered on May 23, 1966, in favor of plaintiffs after a nonjury trial, unanimously reversed on the law and the facts, and the judgments entered in favor of plaintiffs reinstated, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiffs. We find the evidence established the proximate cause of the damage to plaintiff’s property was the blasting by defendants, and substantiates the trial court’s finding in favor of plaintiffs. Concur— Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McNally and Steuer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 A.D.2d 516, 304 N.Y.S.2d 15, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spano-v-perini-corp-nyappdiv-1969.