Spann v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Spann v. State

202 S.W.3d 712, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1380, 2006 WL 2671376

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 19, 2006

DocketED 87275

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 S.W.3d 712 (Spann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spann v. State, 202 S.W.3d 712, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1380, 2006 WL 2671376 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Jameel Spann (“Spann”) appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, the Honorable John F. Kintz presiding, after the court denied Spann’s Rule 29.035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Spann had previously been convicted of First Degree Robbery, Kidnapping, Burglary, and Felonious Restraint.

Spann brings two claims of error, and argues that the motion court erred in denying his motion because, first, he did not receive the effective assistance of trial counsel in that his counsel failed to investigate DeMarcus Money as a sentencing witness on his behalf, and second, that there was an insufficient evidentiary basis to accept his initial plea to the aforementioned charges. We disagree.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI