Spann v. City of Irving

369 S.W.2d 63, 1963 Tex. App. LEXIS 2131
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 31, 1963·No. No. 16168·Published

Opinion

DIXON, Chief Justice.

This is a companion case to the case of City of Irving v. Bull, Tex.Civ.App., 369 S.W.2d 60. Though the two suits were not consolidated they were tried together. The evidence pertaining to both cases was introduced at the same time and has been reproduced in the same statement of facts.

In this case appellant Spann and others attacked the validity of Ordinance No. 652 rezoning certain property from an “A” District (one family dwellings) and a “B” District (two family dwellings) to a “C” District (apartments, boarding houses, etc.)

The property in question lies about 100 feet south of the property originally rezoned in Ordinances Nos. 667, 668 and 669.

For the reasons stated in City of Irving v. Bull, et al. for declaring the amendatory ordinances valid, we hold that Ordinance No. 652 is valid.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spann v. City of Irving, 369 S.W.2d 63, 1963 Tex. App. LEXIS 2131 (Tex. Ct. App. 1963).

369 S.W.2d 63 (Spann v. City of Irving) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Irving v. Bull
369 S.W.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1963)