Spanish Fork West Field Irrigation Co. v. United States

359 P.2d 1060, 11 Utah 2d 388, 1961 Utah LEXIS 167
Utah Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 1961·No. No. 9314·Published

Opinion

WADE, Chief Justice.

This is the second appeal in this case. See Spanish Fork West Field Irrigation Company v. United States, 9 Utah 2d 428, 347 P.2d 184. In that case we reversed the trial court’s decision but made definite limitations in some respects on the distribution of the water of the system involved and the amount to be charged for such water.

The United States and the other defendants appeal from the findings of fact and decree as amended by the trial court, claiming that such findings and decree are not in accordance with our decision. After a careful study of our previous decision and the trial court’s amended conclusions of law and decree, we conclude that said conclusions and decree are in harmony with our previous decision and that the appellants have no ground for complaint. The decision is affirmed. Each party to bear its own costs.

HENRIOD, McDONOUGH, CALLIS-TER and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spanish Fork West Field Irrigation Co. v. United States, 359 P.2d 1060, 11 Utah 2d 388, 1961 Utah LEXIS 167 (Utah 1961).

359 P.2d 1060 (Spanish Fork West Field Irrigation Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spanish Fork West Field Irrigation Co. v. United States
347 P.2d 184 (Utah Supreme Court, 1959)