Spangler v. Campbell

268 S.W.2d 643, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 918
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided May 21, 1954·Published

Opinion

DUNCAN, Justice.

Appellees’ motion to strike the bill of exceptions was sustained by this Court oh September .30, 1953, and appellant’s motion to set aside the order to strike the bill ’ of exceptions was overruled on November 9, 1953. Therefore, the evidence heard in the trial of this action cannot be considered on the appeal.

The only question remaining for our consideration is whether the pleadings are sufficient to support the judgment.' Asher v. Nuckols, 253 Ky. 223, 69 S.W.2d 331; Feltner v. Smith, 283. Ky. 783, 143 S.W.2d 505; Montgomery v. Land, 313 Ky. 374, 231 S.W.2d 86.

We have examined the pleadings and it is apparent that they support the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spangler v. Campbell, 268 S.W.2d 643, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 918 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954).

268 S.W.2d 643 (Spangler v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Asher v. Nuckols
69 S.W.2d 331 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1934)
Feltner v. Smith
143 S.W.2d 505 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1940)
Montgomery v. Land
231 S.W.2d 86 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1950)