Spangler ex rel. Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education

549 F.2d 733
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 1977
DocketNo. 74-2116
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 549 F.2d 733 (Spangler ex rel. Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spangler ex rel. Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education, 549 F.2d 733 (9th Cir. 1977).

Opinion

ORDER ON REMAND

Before CHAMBERS, ELY and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.

The court concludes that" all determinations as to modifications required under Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424, 96 S.Ct. 2697, 49 L.Ed.2d 599 (1976) of the district court’s decrees of 1970 and 1974, should initially be made by the district court. In doing so, it will conclude that some superseding judgment or decree is needed to be entered and to be preceded by current findings of fact.

It seems clear that a bald unqualified order that there shall never be any “majority of any minority” in any Pasadena attendance zone cannot stand.

The resolution of such questions as are mentioned in Part III of the majority opinion by the Supreme Court will necessarily depend on the existing record as it will be supplemented by a subsequent hearing or hearings.

Further than as above indicated, we do not go.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spangler v. Pasadena City Board Of Education
549 F.2d 733 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
549 F.2d 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spangler-ex-rel-spangler-v-pasadena-city-board-of-education-ca9-1977.