Spangenberg v. Tate

561 So. 2d 315, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1693, 1990 WL 27952
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 14, 1990·No. No. 89-00656·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur. ALTENBERND, J., specially concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spangenberg v. Tate, 561 So. 2d 315, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1693, 1990 WL 27952 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

561 So. 2d 315 (Spangenberg v. Tate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Casto v. Casto
508 So. 2d 330 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Flagship Nat. Bank of Miami v. King
418 So. 2d 275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio
143 So. 2d 17 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
Englewood Water District v. Tate
334 So. 2d 626 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Weintraub v. Weintraub
417 So. 2d 629 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Holly v. Auld
450 So. 2d 217 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Belcher v. Belcher
271 So. 2d 7 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
Stregack v. Moldofsky
474 So. 2d 206 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Wheeler v. Meggs
78 So. 685 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)
Van Pelt v. Hilliard
75 Fla. 792 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)
Trapani v. Gagliardi
502 So. 2d 957 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)