Spangel v. Dellinger

42 Cal. 148
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1871
DocketNo. 968
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 42 Cal. 148 (Spangel v. Dellinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spangel v. Dellinger, 42 Cal. 148 (Cal. 1871).

Opinion

By the Court, Sprague, J.:

The attorney for Reay and Ellis moves that the appeal in the above entitled cause be considered, and that the cause be determined as to defendants Dellinger and Treadway. On the former hearing it was considered by the Court—and such seems to have been the understanding of counsel—that the motion for a new trial had been made and the appeal taken by Reay and Ellis alone. Upon a reexamination of the record we are satisfied that our former construction was correct. Counsel appeared expressly for Reay and Ellis. His signature to pleadings, etc., after that time, as the attorney for the defendants, will be construed as limited to those defendants for whom he expressly appeared.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kenney v. Parks
52 P. 40 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Hobbs v. Duff
43 Cal. 485 (California Supreme Court, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 Cal. 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spangel-v-dellinger-cal-1871.