Spang v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided June 29, 2021·No. 3:19-cv-01678·Unknown

Opinion

H. Peter Evans, OSB 012532 Attorney for Plaintiff Evans & Evans, PC 222 NE Park Plaza Drive, Suite 113 Vancouver, WA 98684 Ph. 503-200-2723; Fx. 360-828-8724 peter@evans-evans.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PAMELA F. SPANG, Case No. 3:19-cv-01678-AC Plaintiff,

v. ORDER FOR FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY _| U.S.C. § 2412(d) ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.

It is hereby ORDERED that fees in the amount of $7,791.65 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Attorney and paralegal fees in the amount of $7,791.65 will be paid to Plaintiffs attorney, subject to verification that Plaintiff does not have a debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiff’s attorney, H. Peter Evans: 222 NE Park Plaza Drive, Suite 113, Vancouver, WA 98684. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made out to Plaintiff

ORDER FOR EAJA FEES - 1 12-10 ax7.N1672.AC]

and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney’s office at the address stated above. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this _o27 Hetay ot une 2021. buC~— Jud ge John V. Acosta Unitéd States Magistrate Judge

Proposed Order submitted on June 28, 2021. /s/ H. Peter Evans H. Peter Evans, OSB 012532 Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER FOR EAJA FEES - 2 13:19-cv-01678-AC]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spang v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2021).

Spang v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Spang v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)