Spanel v. Spanel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Spanel v. Spanel

23 A.D.2d 644, 256 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4717

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 9, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 644 (Spanel v. Spanel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spanel v. Spanel, 23 A.D.2d 644, 256 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint in an action for a separation, unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs to the respondent. The only matter for concern raised on this record relates to the basis for fixing the support level for the children. The record is deficient both to sustain the fixation or to impair its propriety. Under the circumstances the court affirms, but without prejudice upon proper proof for a modification to be sought on behalf of the children. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint in an action for a separation, unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs to the respondent. The only matter for concern raised on this record relates to the basis for fixing the support level for the children. The record is deficient both to sustain the fixation or to impair its propriety. Under the circumstances the court affirms, but without prejudice upon proper proof for a modification to be sought on behalf of the children. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 644, 256 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spanel-v-spanel-nyappdiv-1965.