Spalinski v. Suto

31 A.2d 819, 130 N.J.L. 175, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 231
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 29, 1943·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Donges, Porter, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Thompson, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spalinski v. Suto, 31 A.2d 819, 130 N.J.L. 175, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 231 (N.J. 1943).

31 A.2d 819 (Spalinski v. Suto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.