Spalding v. THE PEOPLE OF THE ST. OF NY, EX REL, FREDERICK F. BACKUS

43 U.S. 66, 11 L. Ed. 181, 2 How. 66, 1844 U.S. LEXIS 318
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 24, 1844·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

43 U.S. 66 (____)
2 How. 66

SPALDING
v.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, EX REL. FREDERICK F. BACKUS.

Supreme Court of United States.

Beardsley moved to dismiss the writ of error in this case, because Spalding had given a bond to The People of the State of New York, or Frederick F. Backus.

But Mr. Justice STORY delivered the opinion of the court, and said that the bond was good, and, if forfeited, might be sued upon in the name of the people or of the relator, at the option of the government.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spalding v. THE PEOPLE OF THE ST. OF NY, EX REL, FREDERICK F. BACKUS, 43 U.S. 66, 11 L. Ed. 181, 2 How. 66, 1844 U.S. LEXIS 318 (1844).

43 U.S. 66 (Spalding v. THE PEOPLE OF THE ST. OF NY, EX REL, FREDERICK F. BACKUS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ableman v. Booth
11 Wis. 498 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1859)