Spalding v. Supreme Council, Royal Templars of Temperance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Spalding v. Supreme Council, Royal Templars of Temperance

86 N.Y.S. 1147

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 86 N.Y.S. 1147 (Spalding v. Supreme Council, Royal Templars of Temperance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spalding v. Supreme Council, Royal Templars of Temperance, 86 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment modified, so as to provide that there be paid out of the fundi to the appellants, Mary Jane Beadle and Ira E. Huie, the sum of $198.50, dues and assessments paid by them to the association upon the certificate, and also to the defendant Ira E. Huie the sum of $500 as beneficiary under the original policy or certificate, and the remainder of the $2,000 to the plaintiff, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judgment modified, so as to provide that there be paid out of the fundi to the appellants, Mary Jane Beadle and Ira E. Huie, the sum of $198.50, dues and assessments paid by them to the association upon the certificate, and also to the defendant Ira E. Huie the sum of $500 as beneficiary under the original policy or certificate, and the remainder of the $2,000 to the plaintiff, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spalding-v-supreme-council-royal-templars-of-temperance-nyappdiv-1904.