Spalding v. Imlay
1 Root 551
This text of 1 Root 551 (Spalding v. Imlay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Spalding v. Imlay, 1 Root 551 (Colo. 1793).
Opinion
Before the counsel had gone through the argument, upon some suggestions from the court, the plaintiff withdrew his action. By the rules and regulations of the United States, money taken from their loan officer in this manner would not justify him in an account with their treasurer — besides it would involve the defendant in perpetual difficulty and disputes.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Morgan v. Schmid
27 Conn. Supp. 481 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1965)
Morgan v. Schmid
244 A.2d 824 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1965)
Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Allen
17 F. 171 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia, 1883)
Stillman v. Isham
11 Conn. 124 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1835)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spalding-v-imlay-conn-1793.