Spalding v. Dickinson
161 U.S. 499, 16 S. Ct. 637, 40 L. Ed. 786, 1896 U.S. LEXIS 2181
Opinion
The defendant in error succeeded Mr. Vilas in the office of Postmaster General. The declaration in the present case is, in all material respects, like that in Spalding v. Vilas, just decided. Eor the reasons stated in the opinion in- that case the judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spalding v. Dickinson, 161 U.S. 499, 16 S. Ct. 637, 40 L. Ed. 786, 1896 U.S. LEXIS 2181 (1896).
161 U.S. 499 (Spalding v. Dickinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adams v. Tatsch
362 P.2d 984 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1961)
Greenwood County v. Duke Power Co.
81 F.2d 986 (Fourth Circuit, 1936)