Spalding v. Commissioner
100 F.2d 1020, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 396, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2786, 22 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 396
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 1938
DocketNos. 9050, 9051
StatusPublished
This text of 100 F.2d 1020 (Spalding v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Spalding v. Commissioner, 100 F.2d 1020, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 396, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2786, 22 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 396 (9th Cir. 1938).
Opinion
Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the petition to review in each of above causes be, and hereby is, dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered in each cause, and that the mandate of this court in each cause issue forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
100 F.2d 1020, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 396, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2786, 22 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spalding-v-commissioner-ca9-1938.