Spalbergh v. Walrod

New York Supreme Court

Spalbergh v. Walrod

1 Johns. Cas. 162

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1799

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 162 (Spalbergh v. Walrod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spalbergh v. Walrod, 1 Johns. Cas. 162 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

Lansing, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court. The [200]*200application respects the costs only; we are, therefore, not now to consider whether the declaration contains separate counts, or blends in the same count different causes of action which cannot be joined. One of the injuries complained of is the breaking the plaintiff’s house, and of this the defendant is found guilty by the verdict, which is general, and applies to all the matters charged in the declaration. The plaintiff is, therefore, entitled to costs, instead of being hablé for costs to the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lansing, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court. The [200]*200application respects the costs only; we are, therefore, not now to consider whether the declaration contains separate counts, or blends in the same count different causes of action which cannot be joined. One of the injuries complained of is the breaking the plaintiff’s house, and of this the defendant is found guilty by the verdict, which is general, and applies to all the matters charged in the declaration. The plaintiff is, therefore, entitled to costs, instead of being hablé for costs to the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Johns. Cas. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spalbergh-v-walrod-nysupct-1799.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack