Spain v. Black

Supreme Court

Spain v. Black

179 L. Ed. 2d 1244, 131 S. Ct. 2908, 563 U.S. 1005, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3904, 79 U.S.L.W. 3661

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 23, 2011·No. No. 10-9636·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth Circuit, dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition are submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397,121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Same case below, 333 S.W.3d 270.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth Circuit, dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition are submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397,121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Same case below, 333 S.W.3d 270.

Spain v. Black, 179 L. Ed. 2d 1244, 131 S. Ct. 2908, 563 U.S. 1005, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3904, 79 U.S.L.W. 3661 (U.S. 2011).

Pincite

179 L. Ed. 2d 1244 (Spain v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related