Spain v. Anderson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Spain v. Anderson

151 A.2d 770, 1959 D.C. App. LEXIS 358

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 1959·No. No. 2355·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants sued to recover for property damages to appellant Spain’s automobile sustained as a result of a collision between it and an automobile operated by appellee.

After a trial by the court it made the following entry:.

“The Court finds that the individual plaintiff was 'negligent, the defendant was contributorily negligent and that their concurring acts of negligence were the proximate cause of the accident. Accordingly, the Court finds for the defendant.”

This appeal is from the judgment entered on the finding. The record discloses sufficient evidence to support the finding.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants sued to recover for property damages to appellant Spain’s automobile sustained as a result of a collision between it and an automobile operated by appellee.

After a trial by the court it made the following entry:.

“The Court finds that the individual plaintiff was 'negligent, the defendant was contributorily negligent and that their concurring acts of negligence were the proximate cause of the accident. Accordingly, the Court finds for the defendant.”

This appeal is from the judgment entered on the finding. The record discloses sufficient evidence to support the finding.

Affirmed.

Spain v. Anderson, 151 A.2d 770, 1959 D.C. App. LEXIS 358 (D.C. 1959).

Pincite

151 A.2d 770 (Spain v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.