Spafford v. Pfeffer

264 A.D. 791, 35 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4747

This text of 264 A.D. 791 (Spafford v. Pfeffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spafford v. Pfeffer, 264 A.D. 791, 35 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Order striking from the answer the paragraph designated “ tenth ” on the ground that it is irrelevant and scandalous, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Upon the trial it may be that the matters alleged in this paragraph will become relevant on the question of intent to return. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 A.D. 791, 35 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spafford-v-pfeffer-nyappdiv-1942.