Spadola v. Borough of Wood Ridge

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Spadola v. Borough of Wood Ridge

154 A. 608, 9 N.J. Misc. 438, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 374

DecidedApril 9, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 154 A. 608 (Spadola v. Borough of Wood Ridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spadola v. Borough of Wood Ridge, 154 A. 608, 9 N.J. Misc. 438, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 374 (N.J. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These are four rules to show cause why writs of certiorari should not go to review certain assessments for street improvements as irregular and unwarranted in law, at least in part. The only question before us in each case is whether a writ should be allowed. Our examination of the proofs-satisfies us in each case that the writ should go. Such writs may accordingly be presented for allowance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

These are four rules to show cause why writs of certiorari should not go to review certain assessments for street improvements as irregular and unwarranted in law, at least in part. The only question before us in each case is whether a writ should be allowed. Our examination of the proofs-satisfies us in each case that the writ should go. Such writs may accordingly be presented for allowance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 A. 608, 9 N.J. Misc. 438, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spadola-v-borough-of-wood-ridge-nj-1931.