Spader v. Davis

5 Johns. Ch. 280, 1821 N.Y. LEXIS 91, 1821 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4
New York Court of Chancery·Decided June 28, 1821·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

The Chancellor said,

that the plaintiffs, at the time of filing their.bill, had acquired, as execution creditors at law, a priority of right, valid in equity, to the trust moneys belonging to the defendant D., and in the hands of the defendant H., and that all payments of the same, by H. to D., subsequent to. the filing of the bill, containing notice of that [283]*283right, and of their claim in pursuance of it, were made in his own wrong. The doctrine in the cases of Brinckerhoff v. Brown, and of M‘Dermut v. Strong, (4 Johns. Ch. Rep. 671. 687.) he considered as applying and governing the case.

It was accordingly decreed, that the defendants, or one of them, within thirty days, pay to the solicitor for the plaintiffs, the 974 dollars and 72 cents, with interest, from the 29th of January, 1820, and the costs of the suit, or that execution issue, &cc. and that the sum, when received, be paid to the plaintiffs, rateably, in proportion to the amount of their judgments. y

Decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spader v. Davis, 5 Johns. Ch. 280, 1821 N.Y. LEXIS 91, 1821 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4 (N.Y. 1821).

5 Johns. Ch. 280 (Spader v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huntington v. Jones
43 A. 564 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1899)
Merchants' National Bank v. Greenhood
41 P. 851 (Montana Supreme Court, 1895)
Claflin v. Gordon
46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 54 (New York Supreme Court, 1886)
Scoville v. Shed
43 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 165 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Greene v. Keene
14 R.I. 388 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1884)
Walsher v. Seligman
13 F. 415 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1882)
Lewis v. Shainwald
48 F. 492 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California, 1881)
Suydam v. Beals
23 F. Cas. 472 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan, 1845)
Durant v. Supervisors of Albany
26 Wend. 66 (New York Supreme Court, 1841)
Lamson v. Mix
14 F. Cas. 1055 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1837)
Egberts v. Pemberton
7 Johns. Ch. 208 (New York Court of Chancery, 1823)
Wintringham v. Wintringham
20 Johns. 296 (New York Supreme Court, 1822)