Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Spadafora v. City of Rome

Spadafora v. City of Rome

257 A.D. 1025, 13 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8943
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 28, 1939
StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 1025 (Spadafora v. City of Rome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spadafora v. City of Rome, 257 A.D. 1025, 13 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8943 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The evidence of the slight incline in the part of the street which connects the sidewalk with the crosswalk was not sufficient to make out a prima facie case of negligence on the part of the defendant. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in a negligence action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 A.D. 1025, 13 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spadafora-v-city-of-rome-nyappdiv-1939.