Spada v. Agency for Persons With Disabilities

160 So. 3d 960, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5564, 2015 WL 1736831
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 17, 2015·No. No. 5D14-3607·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912, 916 (Fla.1957) (recognizing that appellate courts “will not undertake to re-weigh ... the evidence presented before the tribunal or agency whose order is under examination .... [but] merely examine[ ]■ the record made below to determine whether the lower tribunal had before it competent substantial evidence to support its findings”).

LAWSON, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spada v. Agency for Persons With Disabilities, 160 So. 3d 960, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5564, 2015 WL 1736831 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

160 So. 3d 960 (Spada v. Agency for Persons With Disabilities) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rowell v. State
183 So. 3d 1249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)