Spackman v. Byers
6 Serg. & Rawle 385
Opinion
The Court permitted the record to be carried back to the Court of Common Pleas, in order that they might amend it, if they thought proper, by a release of the surplus damages j and at this term, the record being returned with an amendment that removed the objection as to the amount of damages, the judgment was affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spackman v. Byers, 6 Serg. & Rawle 385 (Pa. 1821).
6 Serg. & Rawle 385 (Spackman v. Byers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill v. Newman
47 Ind. 187 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)
Chew's Appeal
9 Watts & Serg. 151 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1844)
Pontius v. Commonwealth
4 Watts & Serg. 52 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1842)
Lacroix v. Macquart
1 Miles 42 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1835)
Kemmerer v. Young
5 Rawle 175 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1835)