Spach v. Kleb

Supreme Court of Florida

Spach v. Kleb

117 So. 2d 726

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 9, 1959

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 117 So. 2d 726 (Spach v. Kleb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spach v. Kleb, 117 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari was issued herein by reason of the fact that it appeared to reflect jurisdiction, based upon an alleged conflict with three decisions of this Court. Accordingly, we issued the writ. After hearing oral argument, and upon consideration of the cause, we have determined that no conflict exists, and the petition is without merit. The writ must therefore be, and the same is hereby discharged, Fla.App., 112 So.2d 21.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari was issued herein by reason of the fact that it appeared to reflect jurisdiction, based upon an alleged conflict with three decisions of this Court. Accordingly, we issued the writ. After hearing oral argument, and upon consideration of the cause, we have determined that no conflict exists, and the petition is without merit. The writ must therefore be, and the same is hereby discharged, Fla.App., 112 So.2d 21.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 So. 2d 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spach-v-kleb-fla-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack