Spach v. Kleb

Supreme Court of Florida

Spach v. Kleb

117 So. 2d 726

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 9, 1959·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari was issued herein by reason of the fact that it appeared to reflect jurisdiction, based upon an alleged conflict with three decisions of this Court. Accordingly, we issued the writ. After hearing oral argument, and upon consideration of the cause, we have determined that no conflict exists, and the petition is without merit. The writ must therefore be, and the same is hereby discharged, Fla.App., 112 So.2d 21.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari was issued herein by reason of the fact that it appeared to reflect jurisdiction, based upon an alleged conflict with three decisions of this Court. Accordingly, we issued the writ. After hearing oral argument, and upon consideration of the cause, we have determined that no conflict exists, and the petition is without merit. The writ must therefore be, and the same is hereby discharged, Fla.App., 112 So.2d 21.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur.

Spach v. Kleb, 117 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1959).

Pincite

117 So. 2d 726 (Spach v. Kleb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related