Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Space Development, Inc. v. Florida One Construction, Inc.

Space Development, Inc. v. Florida One Construction, Inc.

695 So. 2d 854, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6707, 1997 WL 330463
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Space Development, Inc. v. Florida One Construction, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 657 So. 2d 24 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 18, 1997·No. No. 96-3299·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We summarily deny the petition for writ of certiorari. Petitioner has not shown that the trial court failed to comply with this court’s prior opinion permitting Respondent to maintain its notice of lis pendens on Petitioner’s property, subject to posting a good and sufficient bond. Space Dev., Inc. v. Florida One Constr., Inc., 657 So.2d 24 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). In granting an extension of such notice and bond, the trial court cannot be said to have departed from the essential requirements of law. See Barry Hinnant, Inc. v. Spottswood, 481 So.2d 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

CERTIORARI DENIED.

STONE, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Space Development, Inc. v. Florida One Construction, Inc., 695 So. 2d 854, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6707, 1997 WL 330463 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

695 So. 2d 854 (Space Development, Inc. v. Florida One Construction, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Space Development, Inc. v. Florida One Construction, Inc.
657 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Barry Hinnant, Inc. v. Spottswood
481 So. 2d 80 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)