Soybel Drug Co. v. Soybel
267 A.2d 442, 159 Conn. 603
Opinion
The judgment rendered was predicated on the trial court’s exercise of a judicial discretion upon a consideration of all of the equities involved. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the court abused that discretion.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Soybel Drug Co. v. Soybel, 267 A.2d 442, 159 Conn. 603 (Colo. 1970).
267 A.2d 442 (Soybel Drug Co. v. Soybel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ashmore v. Hartford Hospital
208 A.3d 256 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2019)