Sowell v. Winter
This text of 321 F. App'x 667 (Sowell v. Winter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[668]*668MEMORANDUM
William V. Sowell appeals pro se from the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s order extending the deadline to file a first amended complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the district court’s November 26, 2007 order was not a final appealable order. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc) (explaining that an order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend is not a final order).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
321 F. App'x 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sowell-v-winter-ca9-2009.