Sowell v. Travelers Insurance Co.

207 N.C. 372
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 21, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 207 N.C. 372 (Sowell v. Travelers Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sowell v. Travelers Insurance Co., 207 N.C. 372 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: The nonsuit is correct. The plaintiff knew the amount of his insurance, as well as the monthly pre[374]*374miums to be deducted by tbe employer, changed back and forth accordingly as he was demoted or promoted from one classification to another. With this knowledge he cannot, while manager, be heard to say he was superintendent.

In the case of Deesa v. Ins. Co., 204 N. C., 214, 167 S. E., 797, cited and relied upon by plaintiff, the employee had no such knowledge or information. The two cases are not alike.

Affirmed.

SchbNCK, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deese v. Travellers Insurance
167 S.E. 797 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 N.C. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sowell-v-travelers-insurance-co-nc-1934.