Sowash v. Consolidated Traction Co.

41 A. 743, 188 Pa. 618, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 656
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 14, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 70·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In the court these were two cases consolidated into one and tried at the same time and before the same jury, the plaintiffs being husband and wife. There was evidence that the motorman opened the front door of the car and invited Mrs. Sowash to leave the car from the front platform. She testifies that she followed his direction and descended to the gronnd from the steps of the front platform. The ground was broken and the night was dark, and the plaintiff testifies that within a very few steps she caught her foot in some way and fell to the ground and sustained her injuries. As there was no proof of [621] any contributory negligence on her part, if the jury believed her story, she was entitled to recover and her husband also. The case must necessarily have been submitted to the jury, and could not have been taken from them without error.

The judgments are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sowash v. Consolidated Traction Co., 41 A. 743, 188 Pa. 618, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 656 (Pa. 1898).

41 A. 743 (Sowash v. Consolidated Traction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shapiro v. Yellow Cab Co.
79 F. Supp. 348 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1948)
Patterson v. Duke Power Co.
36 S.E.2d 713 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. Woods
184 S.W.2d 93 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1944)
Damm v. East Penn Transportation Co.
182 A. 720 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Curtiss-Wright Flying Service, Inc. v. Williamson
51 S.W.2d 1047 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co. v. Soper
286 S.W. 776 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1926)
Mayhew v. Valley Electric Railway Co.
254 S.W. 202 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1923)
Sweet v. Louisville Railway Co.
67 S.W. 4 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1902)