Sow v. Adducci

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided June 22, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-02140·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

SAIDU SOW,

Petitioner, : Case No. 2:20-cv-2140

-vs- Judge Sarah D. Morrison Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

REBECCA ADDUCCI, : Respondent.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon consideration of a Report and Recommendation (R&R) issued by the Magistrate Judge on June 4, 2020. (ECF No. 8). In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court grant Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss or alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 3). The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed. For the reasons set forth in the R&R, the Court hereby ADOPTS the R&R (ECF No. 8), GRANTS Respondent’s Motion (ECF No. 3), and DISMISSES the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1). Petitioner has waived his right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TERMINATE this action from the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Sarah D. Morrison SARAH D. MORRISON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sow v. Adducci, (S.D. Ohio 2020).

Sow v. Adducci (Sow v. Adducci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related