Sovik v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc.

127 A.D.2d 996, 512 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53422

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and submission of controversy dismissed. Memorandum: The court erred in deciding a purported action on submitted facts pursuant to CPLR 3222 because such a submission must consist of a statement of all the facts upon which the controversy depends. The court improperly considered affidavits submitted by the parties which raised factual issues (see, Ditmars-31’ St. Dev. Corp. v Punia, 17 AD2d 357, 360). It is impossible to decide the case on the submission alone because it is incomplete. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mordue, J. — submission of controversy.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sovik v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc., 127 A.D.2d 996, 512 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

127 A.D.2d 996 (Sovik v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ditmars-31' Street Development Corp. v. Punia
17 A.D.2d 357 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)