Sovereign Camp v. Shablauskas

234 A.D. 725

This text of 234 A.D. 725 (Sovereign Camp v. Shablauskas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sovereign Camp v. Shablauskas, 234 A.D. 725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Order, so far as it denies plaintiff's motion for an order of interpleader and for leave to deposit $1,351.82 with the clerk and thereupon be discharged from liability to defendants, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant, payable by respondents Nenius, and motion granted to that extent, without costs. In all other respects the order is affirmed, without costs. The plaintiff has expressed a willingness to deposit the sum of $1,351.82 into court, to be paid to the claimant entitled thereto. The matter of counsel- fee, disbursements and allowances is based upon contract and cannot be determined on this motion. If plaintiff insists upon these items, it may result in a dispute which would make an order of interpleader unavailable to it. While the only defendants before the court indicate a willingness to have these items fixed and allowed, the other defendants are silent with reference thereto. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 A.D. 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sovereign-camp-v-shablauskas-nyappdiv-1931.