Sovereign Bank v. Licata
981 A.2d 1080, 293 Conn. 935, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 462
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 14, 2009
DocketSC 18477
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 981 A.2d 1080 (Sovereign Bank v. Licata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sovereign Bank v. Licata, 981 A.2d 1080, 293 Conn. 935, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 462 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
The petition by the substitute plaintiff, Seven Oaks Partners, LP, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 483 (AC 28286), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the statute of frauds as adopted in General Statutes § 52-550 does not bar an action brought in tort which relies in whole or in part upon terms of an agreement that is barred specifically by § 52-550 (a) (4)?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sovereign Bank v. Licata
172 A.3d 1263 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2017)
Sovereign Bank v. Licata
36 A.3d 662 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)
Biro v. Matz
33 A.3d 742 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
McBurney v. Paquin
28 A.3d 272 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. Chung Family Realty Partnership, LLC
10 A.3d 61 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
981 A.2d 1080, 293 Conn. 935, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sovereign-bank-v-licata-conn-2009.