Sovereign Bank v. Licata
981 A.2d 1080, 293 Conn. 935, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 462
Opinion
The petition by the substitute plaintiff, Seven Oaks Partners, LP, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 483 (AC 28286), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the statute of frauds as adopted in General Statutes § 52-550 does not bar an action brought in tort which relies in whole or in part upon terms of an agreement that is barred specifically by § 52-550 (a) (4)?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sovereign Bank v. Licata, 981 A.2d 1080, 293 Conn. 935, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 462 (Colo. 2009).
981 A.2d 1080 (Sovereign Bank v. Licata) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sovereign Bank v. Licata
172 A.3d 1263 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2017)
Sovereign Bank v. Licata
36 A.3d 662 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)
Biro v. Matz
33 A.3d 742 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
McBurney v. Paquin
28 A.3d 272 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. Chung Family Realty Partnership, LLC
10 A.3d 61 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)