Souza v. Town of Ossining

285 A.D.2d 543, 727 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7486
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 16, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence, the plaintiffs appeal, [544] as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), dated October 5, 2000, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Town of Ossining which was to dismiss the first cause of action insofar as asserted against it for failure to file a notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs did not file a notice of claim in compliance with General Municipal Law § 50-e with respect to a claim arising from an incident which occurred on May 12, 1997. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the respondent’s motion which was to dismiss the first cause of action insofar as asserted against it (see, Hey v Town of Napoli, 265 AD2d 803; Steinberg v Village of Garden City, 247 AD2d 463; Perry v City of New York, 238 AD2d 326). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano, Feuerstein and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Souza v. Town of Ossining, 285 A.D.2d 543, 727 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

285 A.D.2d 543 (Souza v. Town of Ossining) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

829 Post, LLC v. Town of Eastchester
57 A.D.3d 717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)